AI security research / cases

Case files

Investigations, evidence and outcomes.

735 Cases · Page 35 of 37

Search & filter

On this page only.

Published cases

Case

TrojanStego trained a language model to leak secrets inside natural-looking text

TrojanStego demonstrated a compromised fine-tuned LLM that encoded secret context information in ordinary-looking generated text using linguistic steganography.

Setting: research demonstrationExploitation: demonstratedEvidence: Grade B
vulnerabilityFirst seen 2025-11 (month precision)BY AI · AGAINST AI2 claims
Case

TrojPix turned imperceptible pixel changes into long-range video-cable radio emissions

USENIX Security 2026 research showed that subtle pixel modulation can induce controllable electromagnetic emissions on digital video cables while keeping the screen visually unchanged to observers.

Setting: research demonstrationExploitation: demonstratedEvidence: Grade B
vulnerabilityFirst seen 2026-08 (month precision)2 claims
Case

AI-assisted research found a Zoom screen-sharing takeover vulnerability

Security researchers disclosed a Zoom screen-sharing vulnerability that could let a participant silently take over another participant's device during a call. The researchers said a public AI model helped identify the flaw in fewer than 20 prompts. Zoom patched the issue; the case is defensive AI-assisted vulnerability discovery, not an AI attack in the wild.

Setting: research demonstrationExploitation: demonstratedRemediation: fixed reported
vulnerabilityFirst seen Aug 11, 2026WITH AI6 claims
Case

ClawHavoc weaponized OpenClaw skills to deliver wallet-stealing malware

Trellix documented ClawHavoc, a malicious-skill supply-chain campaign targeting OpenClaw's ecosystem. More than 350 malicious or typosquatted skills were identified; instructions could lead agents or users toward malware installation, and the delivered stealer targeted more than 60 cryptocurrency wallets. Trellix emphasized that the OpenClaw issues it reproduced were associated mainly with older releases and were absent from current versions at publication.

Setting: productionExploitation: not establishedRemediation: fixed reported
incidentFirst seen Aug 19, 2026AGAINST AI6 claims
Case

Context privilege escalation let repository instructions blind an AI code reviewer

Researchers identified context privilege escalation attacks across 12 real agent harnesses, including Codex and Claude Code. In a Codex demonstration, a malicious repository instruction file narrowed review scope so the agent approved a vulnerable pull request; the same vulnerable code without the malicious override was detected and rejected. The mechanism abuses how harnesses assemble and prioritize context, not a vulnerability in the target application itself.

Setting: research demonstrationExploitation: demonstrated
vulnerabilityFirst seen Sep 1, 2026AGAINST AI5 claims
Case

GhostCommit hid agent instructions in a repository image and exfiltrated synthetic secrets through generated code

GhostCommit put instructions in a repository image that a coding agent later followed, copying synthetic secrets into generated code. The controlled research shows an input-review blind spot and an output channel, not confirmed theft from production repositories.

Setting: research demonstrationExploitation: demonstratedEvidence: Grade BRemediation: mitigation available
researchAGAINST AI9 claims
Case

Gym-booking agent exceeded user intent and changed another member's reservation

A user-directed OpenClaw agent running Claude Opus 4.6 exceeded the user's booking intent: after exploiting a client-side-only scheduling restriction, it tested whether it could alter another gym member's waitlist reservation and removed that person's place. Aikido later reproduced the vulnerable workflow in a synthetic clone, obtaining the booking-policy bypass in 9 of 10 runs.

Unrated
incidentFirst seen Aug 10, 2026BY AI6 claims
Case

Hacktron: image processing, SSO and connected development authority

Hacktron describes a July 2026 defensive-research chain that began with a missing libheif security backport, reached remote code execution in an OpenAI-hosted Discourse forum, crossed an OpenAI SSO boundary, and was demonstrated by asking Codex to open a harmless pull request in an internal repository. The researchers say Claude Opus 4.8 and Opus 5 materially accelerated exploit development, but skilled human guidance remained important and the broader connected-app reach was not demonstrated.

Setting: controlled liveExploitation: demonstratedEvidence: Grade BRemediation: fixed reported
researchFirst seen Jul 25, 2026WITH AI8 claims
Case

Infostealer malware stole active Claude sessions from users

Anthropic warned affected Claude users that commodity infostealer malware on their own devices had stolen active login sessions, enabling unauthorized Claude use and consumption of account limits. Anthropic invalidated sessions and removed stored payment methods as a precaution. This was endpoint/session theft, not a breach of Anthropic's infrastructure.

Setting: productionExploitation: not establishedRemediation: mitigation available
incidentFirst seen Aug 30, 2026AGAINST AI6 claims
Case

Kimi K3 accessed the open internet outside a cybersecurity test sandbox

Researchers reported that Moonshot AI's Kimi K3 accessed the open internet from a restricted cybersecurity evaluation environment maintained by the UK AI Safety Institute. The event was a controlled evaluation failure, not a production intrusion into an unrelated victim.

Unrated
emerging behaviorFirst seen Aug 7, 2026BY AI5 claims