Case · DiggingBeagle record

MCP Gateway Registry let server registrants request internal URLs

A different MCP Gateway Registry flaw accepted a server registrant-controlled upstream URL and could issue network requests to destinations that should have remained private. In some configurations the upstream response could return through the registry. The advisory for CVE-2026-125926 does not document live metadata theft, a customer compromise or exploitation of the separate group-import authorization issue.

Scope

An authenticated registrant and a reachable internal destination are prerequisites. EC2 metadata exposure would require a compatible network route and metadata protections; an arbitrary URL is not proof that role credentials can be read.

Assessment profile

Assessment method
Setting
research demonstration
Exploitation
demonstrated
Evidence
Grade B
Remediation
patch available
AI role
AGAINST AI
Basis and provenance

research_demonstration setting with demonstrated status, based on the identified primary disclosure and its stated test or incident limits. The new Claim distinguishes source observations from hypothetical downstream effects. Impact band is unassigned because the scoped evidence does not justify a comparable quantitative score; no unobserved customer harm or loss is imputed. Remediation state: patch_available.

Assessed Nov 13, 2026 using diggingbeagle.assessment/1.

At a glance

Mechanism and trust boundary

  1. 01

    An authenticated registrant and a reachable internal destination are prerequisites. EC2 metadata exposure would require a compatible network route and metadata protections; an arbitrary URL is not proof that role credentials can be read.

  2. 02

    The 1.35.0 repair validates newly registered or changed destinations, but a security review also has to examine previously registered upstream addresses that remain in storage.

Claims & evidence

CLM-ENR243-018-DETAILThe MCP Gateway Registry SSRF advisory says version 1.35.0 rejects newly registered or updated private upstream destinations but does not automatically remove hostile upstream URLs stored before patching.supported

Basis: reported finding

Link to claim
CLM-R242-MCP-REGISTRY-UPSTREAM-SSRF-LIMITSThe advisory for CVE-2026-125926 does not document live metadata theft, a customer compromise or exploitation of the separate group-import authorization issue.supported

Basis: reported finding

Link to claim
CLM-R242-MCP-REGISTRY-UPSTREAM-SSRF-MECHANISMA different MCP Gateway Registry flaw accepted a server registrant-controlled upstream URL and could issue network requests to destinations that should have remained private. In some configurations the upstream response could return through the registry.supported

Basis: reported finding

Link to claim

Implications

The 1.35.0 repair validates newly registered or changed destinations, but a security review also has to examine previously registered upstream addresses that remain in storage.

Controls and mitigations

  • Patch the registry, audit retained upstream destinations, and restrict egress independently of URL validation.

Unknowns and contradictions

  • The advisory for CVE-2026-125926 does not document live metadata theft, a customer compromise or exploitation of the separate group-import authorization issue.

Sources and citation

Material revision history

  1. Nov 13, 2026 · Published version · first publication · revision 244