A different MCP Gateway Registry flaw accepted a server registrant-controlled upstream URL and could issue network requests to destinations that should have remained private. In some configurations the upstream response could return through the registry. An authenticated registrant and a reachable internal destination are prerequisites. EC2 metadata…
Inspect the ClaimsCase · DiggingBeagle record
MCP Gateway Registry let server registrants request internal URLs
A different MCP Gateway Registry flaw accepted a server registrant-controlled upstream URL and could issue network requests to destinations that should have remained private. In some configurations the upstream response could return through the registry. The advisory for CVE-2026-125926 does not document live metadata theft, a customer compromise or exploitation of the separate group-import authorization issue.
An authenticated registrant and a reachable internal destination are prerequisites. EC2 metadata exposure would require a compatible network route and metadata protections; an arbitrary URL is not proof that role credentials can be read.
Assessment profile
Assessment method- Setting
- research demonstration
- Exploitation
- demonstrated
- Evidence
- Grade B
- Remediation
- patch available
- AI role
- AGAINST AI
Basis and provenance
research_demonstration setting with demonstrated status, based on the identified primary disclosure and its stated test or incident limits. The new Claim distinguishes source observations from hypothetical downstream effects. Impact band is unassigned because the scoped evidence does not justify a comparable quantitative score; no unobserved customer harm or loss is imputed. Remediation state: patch_available.
Assessed Nov 13, 2026 using diggingbeagle.assessment/1.
Evidence basis: CLM-ENR243-018-DETAIL · CLM-R242-MCP-REGISTRY-UPSTREAM-SSRF-LIMITS · CLM-R242-MCP-REGISTRY-UPSTREAM-SSRF-MECHANISM · MCP Gateway Registry advisory GHSA-fc39-fwh3-wv5r
At a glance
The 1.35.0 repair validates newly registered or changed destinations, but a security review also has to examine previously registered upstream addresses that remain in storage.
Read the implicationsThe advisory for CVE-2026-125926 does not document live metadata theft, a customer compromise or exploitation of the separate group-import authorization issue.
Limits and uncertaintyFull account
A different MCP Gateway Registry flaw accepted a server registrant-controlled upstream URL and could issue network requests to destinations that should have remained private. In some configurations the upstream response could return through the registry.
An authenticated registrant and a reachable internal destination are prerequisites. EC2 metadata exposure would require a compatible network route and metadata protections; an arbitrary URL is not proof that role credentials can be read. The 1.35.0 repair validates newly registered or changed destinations, but a security review also has to examine previously registered upstream addresses that remain in storage.
The advisory for CVE-2026-125926 does not document live metadata theft, a customer compromise or exploitation of the separate group-import authorization issue. Patch the registry, audit retained upstream destinations, and restrict egress independently of URL validation.
Evidence reconciliation and effect boundary. A registrant with legitimate permission to add an MCP server should not thereby obtain the gateway’s network access to unrelated internal services. The unsafe address was used by the registry as an upstream request destination, and in some configurations the response could be sent back to the registrant. Cloud instance-metadata exposure depends on network controls and reachable services; the advisory does not confirm actual credential theft. A deployment may need to inspect old registrations as well as update its binary.
Mechanism and trust boundary
- 01
An authenticated registrant and a reachable internal destination are prerequisites. EC2 metadata exposure would require a compatible network route and metadata protections; an arbitrary URL is not proof that role credentials can be read.
- 02
The 1.35.0 repair validates newly registered or changed destinations, but a security review also has to examine previously registered upstream addresses that remain in storage.
Claims & evidence
CLM-ENR243-018-DETAILThe MCP Gateway Registry SSRF advisory says version 1.35.0 rejects newly registered or updated private upstream destinations but does not automatically remove hostile upstream URLs stored before patching.supported
Basis: reported finding
- supportsMCP Gateway Registry advisory GHSA-fc39-fwh3-wv5rprimary disclosure
GHSA-fc39-fwh3-wv5r, Impact and Patches, persisted registrations
CLM-R242-MCP-REGISTRY-UPSTREAM-SSRF-LIMITSThe advisory for CVE-2026-125926 does not document live metadata theft, a customer compromise or exploitation of the separate group-import authorization issue.supported
Basis: reported finding
- supportsMCP Gateway Registry advisory GHSA-fc39-fwh3-wv5rprimary disclosure
GHSA-fc39-fwh3-wv5r, server URL registration, SSRF impact and remediation
CLM-R242-MCP-REGISTRY-UPSTREAM-SSRF-MECHANISMA different MCP Gateway Registry flaw accepted a server registrant-controlled upstream URL and could issue network requests to destinations that should have remained private. In some configurations the upstream response could return through the registry.supported
Basis: reported finding
- supportsMCP Gateway Registry advisory GHSA-fc39-fwh3-wv5rprimary disclosure
GHSA-fc39-fwh3-wv5r, server URL registration, SSRF impact and remediation
Implications
The 1.35.0 repair validates newly registered or changed destinations, but a security review also has to examine previously registered upstream addresses that remain in storage.
Controls and mitigations
- Patch the registry, audit retained upstream destinations, and restrict egress independently of URL validation.
Unknowns and contradictions
- The advisory for CVE-2026-125926 does not document live metadata theft, a customer compromise or exploitation of the separate group-import authorization issue.
Sources and citation
Material revision history
- Nov 13, 2026 · Published version · first publication · revision 244