Case · DiggingBeagle record

AgentTriage required runtime evidence before calling an agent action completed

AgentTriage compares agent events across runtimes to distinguish intended tool calls from completed side effects and abstains when the evidentiary chain is absent.

Assessment profile

Assessment method
Setting
evaluation
Exploitation
not established
Evidence
Grade C
Remediation
not applicable
AI role
WITH AI
Basis and provenance

Primary method paper reports evaluated forensic accuracy, with no independent live production qualification. The impact band remains unknown: available evidence does not establish actual deployed victim outcomes or a comparable measured loss.

Assessed Oct 26, 2026 using diggingbeagle.assessment/1.

At a glance

Claims & evidence

CLM-CP20-AGENTTRIAGE-EFFECTSThe AgentTriage study describes a replayable diagnosis contract across five agent runtimes with groundable claims and mandatory abstention when evidence is incomplete.supported

Basis: reported finding

Link to claim
CLM-CP20-ENRICH-AGENTTRIAGE-EFFECTSAgentTriage reports 159 applicable executions across five runtimes; on 120 adjudicated cases it measured grounded joint diagnosis of 0.858, required-evidence coverage of 0.966 and unsupported-claim rate of 0.036.supported

Basis: reported finding

Link to claim

Unknowns and contradictions

  • The reported diagnosis and evidence-coverage figures are benchmark results; they do not guarantee that unavailable or altered production logs can always reconstruct the action.

Sources and citation

Material revision history

  1. Oct 26, 2026 · Canonical change recorded · new in release · revision 193