AI security research / sources

Source library

Evidence records and original attribution. A Source is connected to specific Claims, not a blanket endorsement of a Case.

30 of 103 published records shown

Source

EchoFuzz - ICSE 2026 Research Track

Official ICSE 2026 Research Track entry for EchoFuzz. Confirms the Research Track placement, authors and the April 16, 2026 conference presentation; its abstract repeats the reported coverage, vulnerability-detection and 37-finding results.

Source

EchoFuzz public implementation

Public EchoFuzz implementation. Repository exposes LLM, dataset, fuzzer, prompts and utility components plus chain_guided.py and iteration_process.py, and links to the ICSE 2026 publication.

Source

EchoFuzz real-world vulnerability disclosure dataset

Researcher-maintained disclosure artifact listing 146 real-world on-chain contract projects and 19 project/address entries totaling 37 reported findings. It states that most teams could not be contacted directly and that CVE applications are in progress; it should not be treated as independent confirmation of 37 production zero-days.

Source

Mandiant AI Risk and Resilience Report 2026 - Case study 1

Primary Google Cloud/Mandiant report documenting an intrusion at an unnamed SaaS provider in which an attacker hijacked an active AI coding-assistant session, introduced poisoned software through the assistant's recommendation path, harvested GitHub OAuth tokens and spread Shai-Hulud across about 100 internal repositories.

Why this archive exists

The source matters after the headline fades.

DiggingBeagle is an independent research project documenting AI security incidents, agent failures, vulnerabilities and AI-assisted operations. A case keeps its claims beside the sources that support, contest or limit them. Later updates stay visible, so a reader can see when the account changed.

We publish case reconstructions, dated reporting and analysis across records. Each has a different evidentiary role. About the project and our methodology explain how the work is reviewed.