Source · DiggingBeagle record

Ledger Security Bulletin 025

Each support, contradiction or context label applies to a cited Claim, not to a whole Case.

Source record

Read the original source ↗

Claim-level citations (4)

supportsLedger fixed Ethereum signing-flow flaws found during internal automated/AI-assisted review: Ledger LSB-025 documents a separate swap-flow issue in which a token approval could be accepted in place of the intended payment.
SRC-LEDGER-LSB025
supportsLedger fixed Ethereum signing-flow flaws found during internal automated/AI-assisted review: For the swap flaw, exploitation required control of the transaction submitted during a swap; the beneficiary and quantity remained constrained to the already accepted swap parameters, and a separate later transaction was required to move funds.
SRC-LEDGER-LSB025
supportsLedger fixed Ethereum signing-flow flaws found during internal automated/AI-assisted review: The swap-path approval/payment confusion was fixed in Ethereum app 1.22.3, published August 25, after internal automated review identified the missing operation-type check on April 28.
SRC-LEDGER-LSB025
supportsLedger fixed Ethereum signing-flow flaws found during internal automated/AI-assisted review: Ledger states it has no evidence that the disclosed Ethereum signing issues were exploited against users.
SRC-LEDGER-LSB025

Cite this record

DiggingBeagle. “Ledger Security Bulletin 025.” https://diggingbeagle.com/sources/ledger-security-bulletin-025/

Citation guidance

Why this archive exists

The source matters after the headline fades.

DiggingBeagle is a non profit research project documenting AI security incidents, agent failures, vulnerabilities and AI-assisted operations. A case keeps its claims beside the sources that support, contest or limit them. Later updates stay visible, so a reader can see when the account changed.

We publish case reconstructions, dated reporting and analysis across records. Each has a different evidentiary role. About the project and our methodology explain how the work is reviewed.