Evidence · DiggingBeagle record
Gong et al.: Authority–Inference Separation in Agentic Finance (Systems)
October 20 revised journal article; full-text fetching hit HTTP 429. Official indexed abstract and operator-supplied excerpt were available, but full journal text and replication were not independently inspected.
- Source role
- primary disclosure
Evidence record
October 20 revised journal article; full-text fetching hit HTTP 429. Official indexed abstract and operator-supplied excerpt were available, but full journal text and replication were not independently inspected.
Claim-level citations (3)
- supportsAgent-wallet tests blocked transaction effects despite successful prompt injection: A gateway that authorized a proposal but did not bind the authorized decision to execution bytes admitted 20/20 targeted post-decision modifications in the authors’ separate synthetic fixtures.
Journal authorization gateway comparison, operator supplied metrics; full text not independently retrieved
- supportsAgent-wallet tests blocked transaction effects despite successful prompt injection: Only 6 of 16 legitimate model-produced requests were authorized in the reported model-in-the-loop experiments, limiting availability in that setup.
Journal model-in-the-loop legitimate-request acceptance, operator supplied metrics
- supportsAgent-wallet tests blocked transaction effects despite successful prompt injection: The revised October study reports eight of eight prompt-injection attempts successfully changed proposed transaction counterparties in two evaluated open-weight models, with zero unauthorized executions under the independent authorization layer.
Journal October 20 model-in-loop result, as presented in indexed article and operator-supplied research material