Evidence · DiggingBeagle record
EarthRecord multi-sensor agents change 53.5% of correct satellite answers after one instrument's data is manipulated
Original EarthRecord paper evaluates agents over multi-decade satellite data and a controlled one-instrument corruption. Of 200 previously correct answers, 107 became incorrect, often following the edited reading despite other sensor evidence. There was no attacked live satellite archive.
- Source role
- primary disclosure
Evidence record
Original EarthRecord paper evaluates agents over multi-decade satellite data and a controlled one-instrument corruption. Of 200 previously correct answers, 107 became incorrect, often following the edited reading despite other sensor evidence. There was no attacked live satellite archive.
Claim-level citations (1)
- supportsEarthRecord agents followed one corrupted satellite sensor despite conflicting records: In EarthRecord’s controlled corrupted-instrument test, 107 of 200 previously correct visual-agent answers became incorrect, and only a small share recognized the sensor discrepancy.
Section 3.3, where analyses fail; corrupted-sensor intervention results