Source · DiggingBeagle record

Context Privilege Escalation paper

Each support, contradiction or context label applies to a cited Claim, not to a whole Case.

Source record

Read the original source ↗

Claim-level citations (4)

supportsContext privilege escalation let repository instructions blind an AI code reviewer: The CPE researchers report that a malicious AGENTS.override.md caused Codex review to approve manipulated vulnerable code, while a control review without the override detected the command injection.
SRC-CPE-SEP01
supportsContext privilege escalation let repository instructions blind an AI code reviewer: Researchers evaluated 12 real agent harnesses and reported consequences including manipulated tool invocation, denial of service, remote code execution and full agent compromise.
SRC-CPE-SEP01
supportsContext privilege escalation let repository instructions blind an AI code reviewer: In the Codex demonstration, attacker-controlled repository instructions caused Codex to approve vulnerable code that it rejected in a control run without the malicious override.
SRC-CPE-SEP01
supportsContext privilege escalation let repository instructions blind an AI code reviewer: The paper defines MessageRole Context Privilege Escalation and Cross-Scope Context Privilege Escalation as two classes of context-assembly attack.
SRC-CPE-SEP01

Cite this record

DiggingBeagle. “Context Privilege Escalation paper.” https://diggingbeagle.com/sources/context-privilege-escalation-paper/

Citation guidance

Why this archive exists

The source matters after the headline fades.

DiggingBeagle is a non profit research project documenting AI security incidents, agent failures, vulnerabilities and AI-assisted operations. A case keeps its claims beside the sources that support, contest or limit them. Later updates stay visible, so a reader can see when the account changed.

We publish case reconstructions, dated reporting and analysis across records. Each has a different evidentiary role. About the project and our methodology explain how the work is reviewed.