Evidence · DiggingBeagle record
AB 316 (Krell): Artificial intelligence defenses, Senate Judiciary Committee analysis
Legislative analysis of AB 316 explains that a defendant who developed, modified or used AI cannot defend a claim merely by asserting that the AI autonomously caused the alleged harm. The analysis also states the limitation clearly: plaintiffs still must establish every element of their cause of action, while defendants may present relevant evidence contesting causation, foreseeability and other issues.
- Publisher
- California Senate Judiciary Committee
- Source role
- primary
Evidence record
Legislative analysis of AB 316 explains that a defendant who developed, modified or used AI cannot defend a claim merely by asserting that the AI autonomously caused the alleged harm. The analysis also states the limitation clearly: plaintiffs still must establish every element of their cause of action, while defendants may present relevant evidence contesting causation, foreseeability and other issues.
Cite this record
DiggingBeagle. “AB 316 (Krell): Artificial intelligence defenses, Senate Judiciary Committee analysis.” https://diggingbeagle.com/sources/ab-316-krell-artificial-intelligence-defenses-senate-judiciary-committee-analysi/