Sompote/Tiger_bot

Analysis: facts, inference and conditions

Observed: No material finding was recorded in the stated scope.

Interpretation: This does not establish safety outside that scope.

Conditional outcome: Changes to the artifact, configuration, dependencies or deployment can change the result.

What to do next

Do not treat this report as a safety decision. Resolve the stated review gap before relying on the artifact.

What held up in scope

184 deterministic checks completed without the checked condition being observed. These are scoped negative observations, not proof of safety.

Reviewed scope

• This report covers only Sompote/Tiger_bot at commit 370409497ac11e8fc5dde5e4667068ed0aacf0ae, acquired as immutable snapshot 92006138-0a9b-4f5b-b4ff-d21c7dbf4656 with SHA-256 2afafb3d7508fb8a56428cbdb418b539ca11bfd47b8f5fe3e62832d628b483dd.
• The Inspector accounted for all 416 declared checks. The result set contains 184 pass results, 8 finding-status checks, 1 skipped result, 222 not-applicable results, and 1 error. These statuses describe deterministic checks, not a whole-artifact security verdict.
• The 30 deterministic candidates are concentrated in a small number of review themes: credential transport and logging, subprocess and code-execution surfaces, randomness, install-time behavior, environment access, and package publication/configuration.
• All 30 pinned machine finding identities remain represented exactly once through the existing finding assessments. This compose pass does not silently promote, dismiss, merge, or replace them.
• The acquired snapshot contains 109 included files, 45 skipped entries, and 2 redactions. Conclusions do not extend to omitted material, Git history, submodules, Git LFS objects, or later upstream versions.
• No target code, package lifecycle hook, test, binary, submodule, browser JavaScript, generated payload, or downloaded artifact was executed.

This conclusion is limited to the reviewed version and purpose. It is not a universal certification.

What remains unknown

• The embedded research context contains machine finding IDs, check IDs, file hashes, and exact locations, but report_context.findings is empty and the relevant source excerpts are not embedded.
• Credential-in-URL, credential-in-arguments, token-logging, and environment-access candidates cannot establish that a live secret is present or exposed without the underlying value and data-flow context.
• Subprocess and code-analysis candidates do not establish command injection, privilege escalation, or unsafe execution without command construction, caller trust, argument provenance, PATH control, and privilege context.
• The Math.random candidate is not a security defect by itself; impact depends on whether the generated value participates in authentication, authorization, secrecy, uniqueness, or another security-sensitive function.
• The npm postinstall candidate establishes an install-time execution surface but not the behavior or risk of the invoked lifecycle command because its implementation is not present in the embedded context.
• Public npm publication configuration describes package distribution behavior and is not itself a vulnerability.
• Pass results apply only to their named deterministic conditions and inspected scope; they are not evidence that the surrounding code or artifact is safe.
• Known-vulnerability coverage is unavailable because the pinned osv-offline adapter failed and no vulnerability database version is available.
• The machine summary reports three skipped surfaces and one skipped check result. The snapshot also records 45 skipped entries and two redactions; those omissions are not assumed safe or irrelevant.
• Git history, submodule contents, and Git LFS objects were not acquired, and no runtime behavior was exercised.
• Because exact source excerpts are unavailable in this fallback context, the 30 deterministic candidates remain evidence leads rather than fully adjudicated editorial findings.
• A safety rating cannot be defended from the available evidence. The 30 machine candidates are located and categorized, but exact source context is missing, the offline vulnerability adapter failed, and skipped or reduced surfaces remain unresolved.

Report history

Compose pass for report revision 3. Reworked the existing enriched Audit into a standalone reader-facing dossier with a clearer review boundary, candidate-family interpretation, methodology, limitations, and conclusion. Machine-owned Inspection identity and prior finding dispositions remain unchanged.